Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:34

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why did McLaren hope that the Ferrari pair would pit twice during the Italian Grand Prix?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Log in to your Samsung account by the end of next month or forever hold your peace - Android Police
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Do you enjoy cheating on your spouse? If so, why?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Rikishi calls for WWE writers to be fired for botching Jey Uso’s world title run - Cageside Seats
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
DC-area pediatrician on CDC urging summer camp operators to screen for measles immunity - WTOP
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.